data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/620df/620df5299fce60fa178335a21381efd14f09c642" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cd02/6cd024c5770b84f473c922a446312661878a2f5a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f600/6f60074dccac2ade2f82e0ad993667e6b3e3281a" alt=""
Lots of empty nests these days in China.
With nearly 1.4 billion people and one-fifth of the entire human race, it may surprise you to learn there are 50 million empty houses in China. By “empty” I don’t mean “abandoned” or “uninhabitable.” They have owners, and by Chinese standards are perfectly acceptable places to live.
So why are they empty?
China’s “one-child policy,” which was in place for decades before being slightly modified, combined with the Chinese preference for boys, created a gender imbalance. The number of never-married men in their thirties in China is now larger than the population of Canada.
This means that competition for wives is fierce. To even stand a chance, a potential groom must own a home. Thus, families often chip in to buy lonely Chinese bachelors a concrete-and-steel-advantage in the marriage lottery.
But empty structures aren’t the only way that China’s “one-child policy” has come up empty.
Demographics shapes destiny, and denying this truth never ends well. We in the West should take note.
Topics
China
Culture/Institutions
Demographic Disaster
International Affairs
Marriage/Family
One Child Policy
Have a Follow-up Question?
Want to dig deeper?
If you want to challenge yourself as many others have done, sign up below.